L.I. How Did We Get Here? Environment
Environment
A Timeline of Environmental Movements on Long Island
Long Islanders feel a strong connection to our parks, marinas, beaches, and bays. In addition, our federally designated sole-source drinking water aquifer places the environmental consequences of human actions higher in the consciousness of Long Islanders. Due to this, the constrained geography of the Island, and because the region became the site of the first heavily auto-dependent suburban sprawl, many environmental issues came to a head here before other regions had to deal with them. Environmental awareness and movements for environmental protection arose on Long Island. Long Island voters have consistently supported efforts to set aside funds for open space preservation and drinking water protection, with overwhelming, bipartisan support. Citizen action on other issues such as solid waste disposal, recycling, litter, pesticide regulation, and more, were all pioneered on Long Island, with the region providing leadership for New York State, and often the nation.
Considering our vulnerable environmental resources and the challenges we still face, to successfully implement forward-thinking solutions, it’s worth asking, Long Island, how did we get here?
This 17-minute video is an introduction to the history of environmental advocacy movements on Long Island. The region has been a leader on green issues in New York State and the nation.
ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION ON LONG ISLAND — TIMELINE OF EVENTS
1967 — Environmental Defense Fund founded
From their living rooms after work in the mid 1960s, a trio of Long Island scientists and avid birders, Art Cooley, Charlie Wurster, and Dennis Puleston came together to discuss and document what they were observing - the decline of the osprey population. A few years prior in 1962, Rachel Carson’s book, “Silent Spring” was published. In her book, Carson effectively argued that the pesticide DDT, widely used at the time and since WWII, was having a destructive effect on the environment. Specifically, causing the shells of bald eagles and peregrine falcon eggs to thin, weaken, and break, ultimately threatening their survival.
Back on Long Island, this small group of scientists researching the osprey population decline found that unhatched eggs contained substantial concentrations of DDT. They asked the Suffolk County Mosquito Control Commission to stop using the chemical. The commission was unmoved and continued to use DDT, citing its efficacy and cost efficiency.
Unprecedented at the time, the scientists joined with a lawyer and went to the NY State Supreme court in Riverhead and filed a lawsuit on behalf of the environment. They prepared for months and made a convincing case. DDT wasn’t just poisoning bird species, but also crustaceans while diminishing in value as a mosquito control, as the insects were becoming resistant to it. A few weeks later, the court issued an injunction against the use of DDT by the Mosquito Control Commission. The injunction lasted a year, but the lawsuit was ultimately thrown out. DDT, however, was never sprayed on Long Island again. The scientists had won the case in the court of public opinion.
In 1967, the group of scientists gathered in a conference room at Brookhaven National Laboratory and signed documents of incorporation to form the Environmental Defense Fund. Their first office was above the Stonybrook Post Office. Ultimately, the New York State Legislature banned DDT in 1971, and a nationwide ban followed in 1972. Following the national ban, the bald eagle and peregrine falcon were removed from the federal endangered species list, and Long Island osprey populations made a dramatic recovery.
Interview with EDF Founding Trustee Charlie Wurster highlighting the organization’s history: https://www.edf.org/sites/default/files/specialreport_summer2015.pdf
NY Times article on the passing of EDF founder Dennis Puleston: https://www.nytimes.com/2001/06/16/nyregion/dennis-puleston-95-environmental-leader.html
LI Press Obituary of Art Cooley: https://www.longislandpress.com/2022/02/25/art-cooley-a-pioneering-long-island-environmentalist-dies-at-age-87/
1970s — Southwest Sewer District Scandal
In 1969 voters in the southwestern portion of Suffolk County voted for establishment of the Southwest Sewer District. The plan soared in price, was hindered by corruption and defrauded taxpayers. Ultimately, turning into a $120-million bid-rigging case and one of the biggest scandals in the history of Suffolk County in which two vendors were convicted and four others paid fines without admitting guilt.
The scandal took down the administration of County Executive John V. N. Klein of Smithown. With the scandal central to his campaign, then Islip Town Supervisor Peter F. Cohalan ran against Klein in a Republican primary for county executive and won, then won again in the general election. Cohalan’s campaign slogan called on Republican voters to “Flush Klein.” The scandal effectively ended sewer expansion in Suffolk County for decades. As a result, county officials estimate at least 70 percent of the county relies on cesspools.
1981 NY Times article: https://www.nytimes.com/1981/02/01/nyregion/sewer-suit-charges-pattern-of-corruption-over-10-year-period.html
LI Business News article, “Down the Drain” https://libn.com/2006/07/21/down-the-drain/
Karl Grossman piece touching on the history of the scandal: https://www.thefoggiestidea.org/2015/06/24/karl-grossman-a-new-push-for-sewers-in-suffolk-county/
1971 Suffolk Phosphate Ban - The ban was enacted by the Suffolk Legislature because the slow‐degrading, foam‐producing “surfactants” in detergents were being recycled from the county's cesspools into the shallow water supply on which the county depends for its drinking water. In those days billows of suds appeared in fresh water and on occasion from water taps in homes.
1970 NYTimes article, “Suffolk Accepts Detergents Ban”: https://www.nytimes.com/1970/11/12/archives/suffolk-accepts-detergents-ban-consumers-and-stores-hope-for.html
1976 NYTimes article: https://www.nytimes.com/1976/07/19/archives/suffolk-still-awash-in-controversy-over-detergent-ban.html
Associated Press Archive video on the ban: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSJkBwiMx3Y
1971 LIFE Magazine article on the ban: https://books.google.com/books?id=J0AEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA35&lpg=PA35&dq=suffolk+phosphate+ban&source=bl&ots=91T3RPnQmN&sig=ACfU3U39B01EgWVMHS-p_vtc77P-wVF5Kg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiT2Mmz-b_5AhWOjYkEHY-QCKgQ6AF6BAgvEAM#v=onepage&q=suffolk%20phosphate%20ban&f=false
1981 — Suffolk Bottle Bill
Sponsored by then-Lindenhurst legislator, Patrick Halpin, the bill passed the Suffolk County Legislature by a vote of 12-6 to require 5-cent deposits on soda and beer bottles and cans sold in the county. At the time, it was regarded as a test of the issue on the state level, which passed in NY State the following year. Backing for the bill was generally positioned around the deposits being a way of cleaning up roadways and reducing the amount of waste that municipalities are responsible for disposing of.
NYTimes article 1981 on the bill’s passing the legislature: https://www.nytimes.com/1981/03/25/nyregion/5-cent-bottle-deposit-bill-passed-in-suffolk-county.html
1981 — Town of Islip Recycling
The Town of Islip becomes the first Long Island Town to establish a recycling program asking residents to voluntarily separate glass, metal containers, and newspapers. A few years later the program became mandatory throughout the town and more Long Island municipalities followed suit.
NYTimes article: https://www.nytimes.com/1981/10/18/nyregion/recycling-less-gold-in-garbage.html
NYTimes article: https://www.nytimes.com/1981/10/18/nyregion/recycling-less-gold-in-garbage.html
1983 — Long Island Landfill Law
Enacted in 1983, and with the overwhelming support of Long Island elected officials, the Long Island Landfill Law restricted the types of waste that can be placed in landfills in order to protect drinking water from contamination. The law placed a moratorium on the use of landfills for garbage disposal over the Island’s aquifer system which had to stop by 1990. Long Island’s supply of fresh drinking water is drawn from an aquifer system that is comprised of several freshwater zones, or “aquifers”. The designation by the Environmental Protection Agency of Long Island as the first sole source aquifer system in the New York State was the basis on which the law was created.
NY Times article: “What the Island’s Landfill Law Specifies” https://www.nytimes.com/1989/09/03/nyregion/l-what-the-island-s-landfill-law-specifies-148589.html
Local Governments and the Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Business report from the Office of the State Comptroller: https://www.osc.state.ny.us/files/local-government/publications/pdf/landfills-2018.pdf
1987 — 1/4¢ Sales Tax to Protect Drinking Water
The Drinking Water Protection Program, enacted in 1987, was designed to preserve land atop the Island’s purest water supplies, stabilize sewer costs, and regulate taxes. The program has generated more than $1 billion. Funds come from a 1/4 cent sales tax, first approved by voters in 1987 and numerous times since its original inception, by wide majorities.
1987 — Islip Garbage Barge
Chartered by entrepreneur and owner of the barge, Lowell Harrelson and Luchese family mob boss, Salvatore Avellino, the barge set sail on March 22 from Islip carrying 3,168 tons of trash headed for a pilot program in Morehead City, North Carolina to be turned into methane. While in transit, a rumor proliferated that the trash contained hospital waste, syringes and diapers that contaminated the entire load. The barge was docked at Morehead City until a local WRAL-TV news crew, acting on a tip, flew over the barge by helicopter to investigate. The story broke on the 6 p.m. news on April 1, 1987, and North Carolina officials began their own investigation, resulting in an order refusing to accept the waste. The barge then continued along the coast looking for another place to offload. After an 11-day delay, the barge made its way to its home port in Louisiana but that state, too, refused to accept the waste. Likewise, Alabama and three other states, the nations of Mexico, Belize, and the Bahamas also rejected the load before the operators abandoned the plan and returned to New York.
The owner of the garbage barge, tried to negotiate to dock near Queens, NY where the load would be carried back to Islip by truck, but Claire Schulman, borough president of Queens at the time, secured a temporary restraining order that forced the waste to stay offshore. The barge stayed off the shores of Brooklyn decaying until July, when the vessel was granted a federal anchorage in New Jersey. Court hearings ran until October, when it was arranged that the cargo would be incinerated in Brooklyn and the 430 tons of ash that remained would be dumped at the Islip landfill.
At the time, the incident was widely cited by environmentalists and the media as representative of the solid-waste disposal crisis in the United States and a shortage of landfill space. The incident sparked national public discussion about waste disposal and was likely a factor in increased recycling rates in the late 1980s and after.
NY Times article “Garbage Barge Returns in Search of a Dump” https://www.nytimes.com/1987/05/18/nyregion/garbage-barge-returns-in-search-of-a-dump.html
2017 Newsday project looking back on the 30 year anniversary of the garbage barge: https://projects.newsday.com/long-island/long-island-garbage-barge-left-islip-30-years-ago/
PBS Retro Report on the garbage barge (video) https://www.pbs.org/video/retro-report-on-pbs-season-1-episode-3-garbage-barge-helped-fuel-movement/
1989 — “The War of the Woods”
In the late 1980s, real estate development including strip malls and housing developments of suburban sprawl was responsible for Long Island losing vast acres of its valued woodland Pine Barrens at the rate of nearly 5,000 acres a year. The ecosystem that once covered 250,000 acres had declined to an estimated 125,000 acres. At the time 234 development projects were proposed in the remaining Pine Barrens area. The Long Island Pine Barrens Society founded in 1977 by three Long Island naturalists to increase public understanding of the significance of the Pine Barrens found itself in a historic effort to stop development before the Pine Barrens ceased to be a viable ecosystem.
On November 21, 1989, the Pine Barrens Society filed the largest environmental lawsuit in the history of New York State asking the State Supreme Court to require a collective environmental assessment of all the projects in this critical region under the State Environmental Quality Review Act.
The Society quickly gained a reputation as determined fighters for drinking water protection and open space preservation. The founders enlisted communications professional and community education expert, Richard Amper, as their first professional staff person. They educated him on everything about the Pine Barrens and tasked him with developing and executing a campaign to save the Pine Barrens.
During the campaign, the Society emerged as one of the most effective environmental groups in the state and achieved protection of some 55,000 acres of Pine Barrens through landmark legislation, the Pine Barrens Protection Act. Richard Amper and the Pine Barrens Society won several awards for their efforts and received regional and national recognition for the conservation campaign.
Pine Barrens Society co-founder, John Turner on the significance of the Pine Barrens (video)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O5vLlk0kmxo&t=51s
1993 — Long Island Pine Barrens Protection Act.
An unprecedented convergence of environmentalists, business leaders, and government representatives produced the Long Island Pine Barrens Protection Act. This Act, initiated in and passed by the New York State Legislature and signed into law by then governor, Mario Cuomo protected the Pine Barrens forever. It established a five member Central Pine Barrens Joint Planning & Policy Commission to oversee the development and implementations of a Comprehensive Management Plan (CMP); it also delineated two major regions within the 100,000 acre area – a 53,000 acre Core Preservation Area where no new development is permitted and a 47,000 acre Compatible Growth Area where limited, environmentally compatible development is allowed.
The Pine Barrens Protection Act as told by the Pine Barrens Society https://www.pinebarrens.org/the-pine-barrens-protection-act/
NPR article and audio about the fight to save the Pine Barrens: https://www.wshu.org/environment/2019-08-26/the-decades-long-fight-to-save-the-long-island-pine-barrens
2001 — Neighbor Notification Law
On August 21, 2000 then NY State Governor George Pataki signed the Neighbor Notification Law capping a nine -year campaign that started on Long Island. The effort began when environmental organization, Long Island Neighborhood Network received a call from a member who proceeded to tell then staff attorney, Neal Lewis about a pesticide exposure incident her infant was subjected to on a summer day in 1992. The Neighborhood Network proceeded to make a proposal for legislation to protect families from unnecessary pesticide exposure to then Long Island Assemblyman Thomas DiNapoli who championed the reform early in the 1993 legislative session. He drafted and became the prime sponsor of the Prior Neighbor Notification of Pesticide Spraying bill. Later, then Senator Carl Marcellino boosted the effort when upon his election to the State Senate in 1995 became the bill’s prime sponsor in the Senate in his first term. For nine years Long Island Neighborhood Network organized a door-to-door and telephone campaign across Long Island to get the educate the public, distribute hundreds of thousands of brochures, and generate thousands of phone calls and letters from their members calling for the passage of the bill. The bill was strongly opposed by the pesticide industry and upstate farmers, even though it did not restrict agricultural pesticide use.
However, demand for prior notice of pesticide spraying mounted. Prior notice of pesticide spraying made common sense and proved immensely popular with Long Island homeowners. Providing the public with information also represented a strategic offensive against the pesticide industry by creating an informed public who wanted answers about what they were spraying.
What started as an environmental protection effort had grown into an environmental health rights movement. Combined with the efforts of a broad coalition of homeowners, environmentalists, and breast cancer action organizations took the movement statewide. Upon becoming a top environmental priority, Albany-based environmental organizations suggested adding school notices to the bill, which further enhanced its already strong public support. By the time the bill became law, with the hard work of its prime sponsors and their staffs, the Long Island Neighborhood Network, and hundreds of thousands of NY State homeowners the law became the most comprehensive and significant pesticide laws in the nation. The historic, first-in-the-nation statute also paved the way for additional environmental regulations and similar laws in other states.
NYS Dept. of Health’s Neighbor Notification Law Fact Sheet
https://www.health.ny.gov/environmental/pests/public_notification_law.htm
New York Times article, “Legislature to Vote on Pesticide Measure” https://www.nytimes.com/2000/12/10/nyregion/environment-legislature-to-vote-on-pesticide-measure.html
NYTimes “Pesticide Applicators Must Notify Neighbors” https://www.nytimes.com/2001/05/27/nyregion/in-brief-pesticide-applicators-must-notify-neighbors.html
NYS Dept. of Education Neighbor Notification Law Reminder: https://www.p12.nysed.gov/facplan/IPM/Pesticide_Neighbor_Notification_Guideline_Schools_081202.html
2005 — Energy Star Homes Code
In 2005, Congress passed the Energy Policy Act (EPAct) in response to growing energy concerns and tasked three federal agencies (the U.S. Department of Treasury, the Department of Energy, and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development) with a set of actions ranging from tax credits and expanding appliance standards, to increasing outreach and developing plans to improve the energy efficiency of affordable housing.
Home Performance with ENERGY STAR is a national collaborative program that includes a network of 32 utility and nonprofit sponsors, and 1,300 home performance contractors.
Home Performance with ENERGY STAR is now the trustworthy source that helps contractors and energy programs deliver home energy upgrades. The program offers a reliable approach to home upgrades that includes a comprehensive evaluation, with recommended work being performed by trained and qualified networks of contractors. A cornerstone of the program is a set of rigorous quality assurance requirements. The purpose of the federal housing standard is to reduce the amount of energy a house will use once occupied.
Shortly afterward the passage of the Energy Policy Act, regional support for Home Performance with ENERGY STAR began to grow throughout the country, including New York State and Long Island. Both the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority and Long Island Power Authority signed agreements and launched programs to implement Home Performance with ENERGY STAR. On Long Island, Babylon and Brookhaven initially adopted requirements for new home construction, and eventually eleven of Long Island’s thirteen towns followed suit.
Long Island Power Authority further customized the standard for variations in climate on Long Island and also gave each town or municipality passing a similar law a $25,000 grant to help train inspectors to assess new home construction.
The program has proved that establishing better efficiency standards can result in substantial emissions reduction, with little or no expense, while creating long-term savings for homeowners, and advancing “Green Economy” jobs.
Sustainability Institute Green Paper: https://www.molloy.edu/Documents/Sustainability/longislandtownsgreenpaper.pdf
NYSERDA letter to the EPA 2005: https://www.energystar.gov/ia/partners/bldrs_lenders_raters/downloads/NYSERDA.pdf
Energy Star Homebuilding Standards: https://www.energystar.gov/newhomes
2009 — Unified Solar Permits
The Long Island Unified Solar Permitting Initiative was established in 2009 by both the Suffolk County and Nassau County Planning Commissions. Prior to this, the solar installation permitting process on Long Island necessitated a different set of policies for every town and village, which created confusion, added extra costs, and was responsible for installation delays.
As the demand for solar installations grew on Long Island, it became apparent that a more uniform and efficient permitting process needed to be established. The Long Island Clean Energy Leadership Task Force, an initiative administered by the Sustainability Institute at Molloy University, took up the challenge and sought out to identify standards that could be adopted across both counties to help simplify the process of solar installations. Under the direction of the Suffolk County Planning Commission, a committee was formed, which included representatives from the Nassau and Suffolk County Planning Commissions, industry professionals, the Long Island Power Authority, and several municipalities. The Committee endeavored to establish a permitting process that could maintain thorough safety measures and quality control, but also be achieved quickly.
The committee proposed an accelerated and standardized process for residential solar power systems. The new Solar Energy System Fast Track Permit Application process allows municipalities to meet the governing requirements, while reducing the time and money associated with approving solar installation permits. An additional aspect of the application includes waiving the need for a survey of the entire property or other information not relevant to the installation. To encourage municipalities to adopt the initiative, the Long Island Power Authority provides incentives to each Long Island town and to each of the first ten villages where the standard is adopted. It has been adopted by most Long Island Towns and some villages.
Suffolk County and Nassau County Planning Commissions: Long Island Unified Solar Permitting Initiative: https://icma.org/sites/default/files/306434_Long%20Island%20Unified%20Solar%20Permitting%20Initiative.pdf
Long Island Unified Solar Permit Initiative Solar Energy System Fast Track Permit Application
https://nysolarmap.com/media/1182/longislandunifiedsolarpermitform.pdf
ARTICLE: “A Model for Expediting Solar Permits: Long Island Unified Solar Permit Initiative”
2010 — Safe School Grounds Law
On May 10, 2010 then governor, David Patterson signed the Safe School Grounds bill into law. In the nine previous legislative sessions professional lobbyists in Albany extensively representing the chemical industry successfully ensured that the bill died in the Senate. For years prior to and after the passage of the Neighborhood Notification Law in 2001, environmental organization, Long Island Neighborhood Network had been building momentum in demanding safer pesticide use in schools. In 1995, the Neighborhood Network published and distributed the report, “Pesticides and Children: Avoiding the Risks,” which was one of the first highly publicized educational efforts bringing attention to the special risks pesticides posed to children. In 1998, the Neighborhood Network established the Pesticide Alternatives Project, which focused on the availability of alternative and organic lawn and garden maintenance products. In 2002, the Neighborhood Network organized the Toxic-Free Schools Project empowering parents to demand changes in school pest control policies and offering help to schools in designing and implementing pest control plans that do not rely on toxic, synthetic pesticides. At the time it was estimated that over 10 million pounds of pesticides are applied on Long Island every year. A 2000 study by the state attorney general’s office determined that 87 percent of schools in New York use pesticides, with almost 65 percent using pesticides outdoors.
In the 2010 NY State Legislative Session the Neighborhood Network made passage of the Safe School Grounds bill a top environmental priority. With the sponsorship and support of two Long Island elected officials, Senator Brian X. Foley in the Senate, and Steven Englebright in the Assembly and capitalizing a growing body of research and evidence that children are especially susceptible to pesticide exposure, the bill gained widespread statewide attention and was passed in both houses of the legislature. The law bans almost all uses of chemical pesticides on the grounds of schools and day care centers and protects children from unnecessary exposure to toxic pesticides. The law also prohibits pesticides used for lawn care on school grounds, playgrounds, turf, athletic and playing fields. The law does not apply to pesticides used in a health emergency, as determined by the county health department or school board, or to protect children from an imminent threat of biting, stinging and venomous pests. The requirements and guidelines of the law are administered by the State Education Department for schools and by the Office of Children and Family Services for day care centers
Former Senator Brian Foley’s press release on the law’s passage:
Dept. of Environmental Conservation guidance on the law: https://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/materials_minerals_pdf/guidancech85.pdf
American Academy of Pediatrics statement of pesticide exposure in children: https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/130/6/e1757/30399/Pesticide-Exposure-in-Children
2017 — Suffolk County Plastic Bag Fee
Debate about how to approach plastic bags and the environmental impact they have had been a hot topic on Long Island for several years. A Suffolk county bill was proposed in 2016 to ban plastic bags altogether, but it failed to gain necessary support in the county legislature. Instead, on Jan. 1, 2017 the legislature required stores to charge 5 cents for every non-reusable paper or plastic shopping bag, with some exceptions. The county law, passed by a 13-4 vote, requires supermarkets, pharmacies, clothing stores, and other retailers to charge customers 5 cents for each single-use plastic or paper bag they use to carry purchases. Environmental advocates supporting the bill cited data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that indicates that between 500 billion and 1 trillion plastic bags are consumed worldwide every year, and that Americans use more than 10 billion paper bags each year. In addition, an estimated 14 million trees are cut down each year to make paper bags. The Suffolk law aimed to boost reusable bag use and reduce the number of single-use plastic bags polluting waterways and threatening marine life. Following passage of the bill a one-year effectiveness report in 2019 by Suffolk County’s Department of Health Services indicated that use of single-use plastic bags was down 81.7% and single-use paper bags was down 78.8% compared with 2017. The report also showed that in November and December 2017 and in the first two-month of 2018, that use of reusable bags or no bags increased from 27.8% to 60.1%. Furthermore, the reporting indicated that between 2017 and 2018, there was a 42% decrease, to 1,552, in plastic bags that cleanup volunteers found littering Suffolk shorelines.
Newsday article: “Suffolk plastic bag use down by 1.1 billion, report says”
https://www.newsday.com/long-island/suffolk/suffolk-plastic-bag-law-o13823
Department of Health Services One-year Effectiveness Report: https://www.suffolkcountyny.gov/portals/0/formsdocs/health/administration/Annual%20Report%20Final.pdf
2020 — New York State Plastic Bag Ban
Plastic bag use poses significant environmental damage when bags end up as litter on the side of roadways, in trees, and in waterways where they pose an imminent threat to marine life. After several municipalities around the state passed their own single-use plastic bag prohibitions, New York State became the third state in the country, behind California and Hawaii, to pass a bag ban of its own. In New York, where some 23 billion plastic bags are used each year, the Bag Waste Reduction Law went into effect on March 1, 2020. If was not immediately enforced, however, a result of a lawsuit brought before the NYS Supreme Court. In the complaint, the defendants called the rule vague and unconstitutional, and alleged that it directly conflicted with another state recycling law.
On Aug. 20, 2020, a State Supreme Court judge ruled against the defendants, upholding the ban on plastic bags and giving the State Department of Environmental Conservation the green light to begin enforcing it on October 19, 2020. After the effective date, however, the COVID-19 pandemic further delayed rollout and enforcement. Studies have shown that use of single-use plastics increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, as more people opted for takeout food delivery, and local enforcement agencies have looked the other way as small businesses struggled during the state shutdown.
The law affects all plastic bags (except those exempt) from distribution by anyone required to collect New York State sales tax. For sales that are tax exempt, plastic carry out bags are still not allowed to be distributed by anyone required to collect New York State sales tax (unless it is an exempt bag). The law also affects anyone required to collect New York State sales tax, bag manufacturers and consumers. Examples of an exempt bag are bags used by a pharmacy to carry prescription drugs and produce bags for bulk items such as fruits and vegetables.
From the beginning, an important element of the state law has been to encourage consumers to bring their own bags. The law is not intended to replace single-use plastic bags with single-use paper bags, the law was intended for people to bring reusable bags, and not intended to put the burden on the store owners. That remains a point of contention as businesses report that they are bearing the cost burden of replacing plastic with paper, and that they want regulators to allow them to use up their remaining stock of plastic bags before switching. They also note that many customers stop by their establishments on their way home from work or appointments and haven’t necessarily planned in advance to pick up grocery items. Environmentalists have their own complaints with regulators, largely that enforcement remains slow some two years after the law’s passage, and that plastic bag use continues to be ubiquitous as a result.
About 79 percent of plastic waste ends up in landfills, rivers and oceans where it can remain for hundreds of years, according to the United Nations. Even when the larger plastic products degrade, they remain in oceans in a smaller form, known as microplastics, which are easily ingested by fish and wildlife.
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Fact Sheet on the law: https://dec.ny.gov/environmental-protection/recycling-composting/bag-waste-reduction-law
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation information for retailers and manufacturers: https://www.dec.ny.gov/chemical/117781.html
State Supreme Court’s full decision: https://www.dec.ny.gov/docs/materials_minerals_pdf/polypakvsny.pdf
2021 — Suffolk County Sewer Expansion
Approved by county referendum in 2019, Suffolk County lawmakers approved two bills in early October 2021 paving the way for the county’s largest sewer expansion in decades. At a groundbreaking on October 29, 2021, exactly nine years after Hurricane Sandy hit Long Island, Suffolk County announced a $400 million sewer expansion project known as the Suffolk County Coastal Resiliency Initiative. The project was part of a plan to make the region’s coastline more resistant to storm surge in the wake of Superstorm Sandy. Constructed with federal and state grant funds, the initiative aims to connect some 6,000 parcels of land along the Suffolk’s south shore to sewers, jettisoning the need for thousands of cesspools and septic systems that have been identified as a primary cause of the pollution of local waterways. Suffolk County Executive, Steven Bellone said at the groundbreaking, “This a tremendous victory for our economy and our environment.” According to a county statement issued at the time, the construction would be completed at no cost to Suffolk County residents. Instead, the major funding for the project includes $243 million from FEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program, and $66 million from the Community Development Block Grant – Disaster Recovery program administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. New York State committed $30.7 million in state financial assistance, and Suffolk County will invest $42 million of its allotment in American Rescue Plan funding received from the federal government, and $24 million from a sewer stabilization reserve fund.
The sewer expansion project includes the connection of 2,184 homes in the Carlls River Watershed in Babylon to an existing sewer district, and the connection of 1,884 parcels in the Forge River Watershed in Brookhaven to a new treatment facility expected to be constructed in Mastic by 2025. In addition, 1,489 homes located in Suffolk County Sewer District No. 3 that had never been tied into the sewage collection system, will be connected as part of the project.
Sacred Heart University Public Radio audio article and transcript: https://www.wshu.org/long-island-news/2021-10-18/suffolk-countys-largest-sewer-expansion-is-not-a-one-size-fits-all-solution
Governor Hochul’s press release on the project: https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/governor-hochul-announces-start-construction-4088-million-storm-resiliency-sewer-expansion
Summing up
After World War II, Long Island’s mix of vital natural resources, constrained land area, and rapid suburban growth created a set of environmental challenges that appeared here earlier, and often more intensely, than in many other parts of the country. Long Island's sole-source aquifer system, which supplies drinking water to nearly all residents, made protecting groundwater an urgent local issue. Public concern over pesticide use, including the controversial spraying of DDT, helped spark awareness and action that influenced national environmental policy. Long Island was also at the forefront of open space preservation, as community-led efforts led to major achievements like the protection of the Long Island Pine Barrens, a rare ecosystem vital to the region’s water supply. In the 1980s, widespread public opposition led to the shutdown of the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant before it could become fully operational and was a defining moment in the history of environmental activism on the Island. In recent years, Long Island has served as a model for clean energy initiatives, coastal protection plans, and climate change adaptation strategies. These efforts reflect the region’s lasting role as a leader in environmental awareness and action.