| |

Republic
5 (449a-471c)
Plato's
Radical Politics
Contents:
Introduction (449a-450c)
-
Book
Five represents something of a digression---albeit an important
one---in the argument of the Republic.
-
At
the end of Book Four, Socrates was in the midst of
discussing the four types of defective cities, when he is
challenged by Polemarchus to explain what he meant when he said
that the guardians will hold women and children in common.
-
The
discussion of defective cities will be put off until Book Eight.
Book Five, then, returns to the question of the lifestyle of the
guardians, developing Plato's own radical approach to politics.
-
What
we will discover in this book is that Plato takes very seriously
the idea that the Guardians will hold everything in common.
-
It
should be noted that Plato's communalism concerns only the
Guardians, and not to rest of the populations. Plato
believes that unity of the city can only be assured if the
Guardians, who control the city, are themselves united (465b).
The
Equality of Women (450c-457b)
-
Women,
Socrates argues, are equal to men in all ways except in strength.
They should therefore have the same responsibilities as men. If
they are to share the responsibilities of being Guardians, then they
will need the same type of education and training as male Guardians
(451d).
-
Female
guardians would therefore need to be trained music and gymnastics
as well as the art of war alongside the male counterparts
-
Socrates
anticipates the objection that the sight of women exercising naked
with men might very well seem ridiculous according to conventional
Greek customs. If, however, such an arrangement is
advantageous to the city as a whole, it doesn't matter if it flies
in the face of custom (452).
-
Socrates
presupposes a conservative objection to his belief in the fundamental
equality of women (253a-c). The argument that he raises is
something like the following:
-
Premise
1: According to the principle of specialization, each
person should work according to his/her own nature.
-
Premise
2: women and men have different nature
-
Conclusion:
Therefore they should have different functions in society
-
e.g.,
men, who are aggressive by nature, should act as rulers and
warriors, and women, who have nurturing natures, should act as
mothers and teachers
-
Socrates
is presupposing that others may very well accuse him of
contradicting himself, since the principle of specialization seems to
preclude the equality of the sexes (453b). In his
response, therefore, he needs to demonstrate, that, despite their
different anatomies, men and women do not have different natures.
His argument (453e-454c) is as follows:
-
do
bald men and hairy men have different nature? no: the
difference between them is accidental (superficial), not essential
-
the
same therefore can be said of men and women: the difference
between them is not essential to their abilities to do the work of
ruling and protecting the polis.
-
Plato
is using the term nature here as a kind of aptitude, or the
ability to do a certain kinds of work. A physician and a
carpenter, according to this view, would have different
natures, and therefore should play different roles in the
polis (454d).
-
gender,
on the other hand, is irrelevant to men and women's abilities
to do the work demanded of Guardians
-
The
only real objection that can be raised to having women in the ranks of
the guardians is that they have the possibility of having children,
and raising children is a full-time job that preludes all other kinds
of work.
The
Guardian's Family Life (457b-466d)
-
Socrates
now moves to the question of family life of the guardians, which he
has hinted will be completely communal in nature.
-
If
male and female guardians are working and living together, it is
inevitable that there will be some degree of sexual intimacy among
them. The danger of this is that sloppy interbreeding may occur
(the best reproducing with those who are less desirable).
-
The
rulers of the society, therefore, will have to be diligent about
arranging marriages between equally suitable partners. To get
everyone to go along with this, they will have to employ yet another
lie:
-
The
children who are the products of these unions will immediately be
place in a nursery and cared for by nurses.
-
Parent,
therefore, won't know who their own children are (460d)
-
Incest
will be avoided though the careful management of the rulers
(461d-e)
-
children
with defects and those that are products of unsanctioned unions
will be left to die (460c, 461c)
-
Plato's
aim in devising the communal raising of children is to keep the city
unified (462a-c)
-
the
greatest good, he maintains, is that which binds the city together
and makes it one; the greatest evil is that which tears it apart
-
a
city will be unified if its citizens feel pleasure and pain about
the same things, and when no one makes a distinction between what
belongs to him and what belongs to others
-
Because
they possess everything in common, there will be no dissension
among the guardians, and they will better be able to keep the city
together.
-
Because
they think of everyone as their brother/sister, father/mother
there will no lawsuits or voilence among them, nor will they be
included to split off into factions (464d-465b)
-
Socrates
now readdresses the complaint of Adeimantus (419a) that the communal
lifestyle of the guardians wouldn't seem to make them very happy
(465c-466c).
-
Even
though the guardians will have to sacrifice a great deal for the
good of the polis, Socrates is convinced that their lives will
ultimately be much more satisfying than that of the craftsmen.
-
In
the first place, they won't be force to engage in the vulgar
business of supporting a household (465c), and they will have the
satisfaction of knowing that, by their labors, they have preserved
the good of the entire city (465e)
War
and Peace (466d-471c)
Suggestions
for Further Reading
-
Annas, Julia. An
Introduction to Plato's Republic. New York:
Oxford UP, 1981. [170-189]
-
Benardette, Seth. Socrates'
Second Sailing: On Plato's Republic. Chicago:
University of Chicago, 1989. [109-143]
-
Bloom, Allan. The
Republic of Plato. New York: Harper Collins, 1968.
[379-397]
-
Bluestone, Natalie Harris.
"Why Women Cannot Rule: Sexism in Plato Scholarship."
Feminist Interpretations of Plato. Ed. Nancy Tuana.
University Park, PA: Pensylvania State University Press, 1994.
[109-130]
-
Pappas, Nickolas.
Plato and the Republic. New York: Routlege, 1995. [99-114]
-
Sallis, John. Being
and Logos: Reading the Platonic Dialogues.
Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996. [371-401]
-
Saxonhouse, Arlene W.
"The Philosopher and the Femal in the Political Thought of
Plato." Feminist Interpretations of Plato. Ed.
Nancy Tuana. University Park, PA: Pensylvania State
University Press, 1994. [67-85]
-
Spelman, Elizabeth V.
"Hairy Cobblers and Philosopher Queens." Feminist
Interpretations of Plato. Ed. Nancy Tuana.
University Park, PA: Pensylvania State University Press, 1994.
[87-107]
-
Vlastos, Gregory.
"Was Plato a Feminist?" Plato's Republic:
Critical Essays. Ed. Richard Kraut. Lanham, MD:
Rowman and Littlefield, 1997.
-
White, Nicholas P.
A Companion to Plato's Republic. Indianapolis: Hackett,
1979. [139-162]
Department
of Philosophy | Sophia
Project | Plato
Page
© 2000, M. Russo
For more information contact: mrusso@molloy.edu
|
|