| |

Republic
3 (412b-417b)
The
Lifestyle of the Guardians I
Contents:
Division
of the Polis (412b-417b)
-
Having
completed his discussion of the education of the guardians, Plato now
turns to the question of who will rule and be ruled in his polis.
His argument can be summed up as follows:
-
The
rulers of the city must be the best of the best.
-
The
guardians are the best members of the society
-
Therefore
the rulers of Plato's city must be the "most guardianly of
the guardians."
-
The
guardians are the best members of the society, because they are
best able to preserve the city. Therefore, an elite from
among the guardians, argues Plato, ought to be the ones who rule
the city (412a-c).
-
The
rulers of the city ought to be those who love the city most. If
I love something I so identify with its good, that I would even be
willing to sacrifice myself for its sake. The same is true with
the guardians love for the city: they so completely
identify their own good with the good of the city, that they would be
willing to do whatever is necessary to ensure its well being
(412d-e).
-
This
demands that we have rulers who are able to retain their
convictions even in the face of corrupting influences (e.g.,
the desire for pleasure or the fear of pain) . Those
guardians who have been tested, and demonstrate that can maintain
their commitment to the city in the face of corrupting
forces, will become the rulers of the society (413d-414a).
-
Note:
The rulers that Plato wants for his city are those that have
stability of character: they remain unchangeable in the face
of dangerous internal and external forces that threaten the good
of the city. This is contrasted with the instability of
rulers in a democratic society, such as those in Plato's own
Athens (White 104).
The
Noble Lie (414b-415d)
-
Guardians:
rulers of the polis
-
Auxiliaries:
guardians who remain warriors
-
Craftsmen:
rest of the citizens
-
But
how does he convince the rest of the citizens to accept the leadership
of the guardians? The answer is that the rulers of the city must
make them believe a myth—a "noble lie"— about their
collective origins.
-
All
citizens they will be told from very early on were born of the
same mother, the earth. Some have gold in their souls (the
Guardians), some have silver (the auxiliaries) and some have iron
or bronze (the craftsmen). The type of metal that each
person is made of determines the role that they will play in the
society.
-
This
myth is told purely for the sake of those being ruled. The
guardian, of course, know that it is just a myth, but understand
the basic principle that underlies it (e.g., the principle of
specialization).
-
The
point of this myth is to encourage the kind of absolute loyalty to
the city that is akin to the kind of loyalty that one feels
towards family members. Plato's aim is to have all of the
citizens accept the class structure of the city and to put the
good of the city over their own individual good.
-
Plato
has once again offended our egalitarian sensibilities by proposing
what appears to be little more than a rigid caste system. The
difference between Plato's caste system and that of India, for
example, is that his is based not upon wealth or birth, but purely
upon ability.
The
Lifestyle of the Guardians
(415d-417b)
-
At
the end of Book 3, Plato begins a discussion of the lifestyle of the
guardians that will be continued in Book 4. What we discover is
that the guardians will not be allowed to possess private property or
to have any dealings with money (416d-417b).
-
Plato's
aim is to prevent the guardians from having divided interests.
Because they won't be allowed to accumulate wealth, they can work
for the good of the city alone.
-
This
approach also allows Plato to avoid the corruption and conflicts
that can occur when it is possible for rulers to place their own
good above the common good.
-
Plato's
guardians, therefore, will live in common and share all of their
worldly possessions.
-
In
a sense, Plato's communal/communistic approach is similar to that of
religious orders during the Middle Ages. It was believed that if
a monk owned nothing of his own, he would be able to devote himself
totally to God. Similarly, Plato believes that guardians will be
able to commit themselves totally and completely to the good of the
city, because they have no material distractions.
Suggestions for Further Reading
- Annas, Julia. An Introduction to
Plato's Republic. New York: Oxford UP, 1981.
[94-108]
- Benardette, Seth. Socrates'
Second Sailing: On Plato's Republic. Chicago:
University of Chicago, 1989. [65-78]
- Bloom, Allan. The Republic of
Plato. New York: Harper Collins, 1968. [353-369]
- Pappas, Nickolas. Plato
and the Republic. New York: Routlege, 1995. [65-72]
- Rice, Daryl H. A Guide to
Plato's Republic. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998.
[44-52]
- Tate, J. "'Imitation' in
Plato's Republic. Classical Quarterly 26 (1928):
16-23.
- White, Nicholas P. A
Companion to Plato's Republic. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1979.
[95-105]
Department
of Philosophy | Sophia
Project | Plato
Page
© 2000, M. Russo
For more information contact: mrusso@molloy.edu
|
|