On Rhetoric 2.12-17

"Ethos"

Commentary

 


CONTENTS:


 

Ethos (2.12-17)

 

I.  Introduction (2.12)  

  • In this section Aristotle will go into a lengthy description of various character types.  Although in 2.1, Aristotle discusses ethos primarily in terms of the character of of the speaker as a means of persuasion, throughout the rest of Book II he primarily focuses on the ethos of the audience.  The aim here seems to be on how the speaker will have to adjust his ethos to the various types of audiences he is addressing  (Grimaldi 2:186).  In addressing an audience, the speaker, then, needs to keep in mind (1) the age if his audience and (2) their circumstances in life.

  • Although we generally talk in terms of the character of individuals, Aristotle believes that different classes of people also manifest common character traits.  Thus we can also talk about the character of the elderly or of the rich. 

  • "The predominant meaning of ethos in Aristotle is 'moral character' as reflected in deliberate choice of actions and as developed in a habit of mind.  At times, however, the word seems to refer to qualities, such as an innate sense of justice or quickness of temper, with which individuals may be naturally endowed and which dispose them to certain kinds of action."  (Kennedy 162)

 

II.  The Ethos of the Speaker  (2.1)

 

A.  Aristotle's Discussion

 

1.  Before examining Aristotle's discussion of the various character-types that the speaker will encounter in his audience, we must return for a moment to some brief, but very important comments that Aristotle makes in 2.1 about the ethos of the speaker himself.  

2.  According to Aristotle, there are three aspects of the speaker's character that helps to persuade an audience:

 

a)  good sense:

  • does the speaker seem to have intelligence, expertise, authoritativeness?

  • does he appear to know what he is talking about?

b)  good moral character:

  • does the speaker seem to have a virtuous character?

  • does he appear trustworthy?

c)  good will (towards audience):  

  • do we have the feeling that the speaker cares about us?

  • this involves

    • empathy                   (can he see things my way?)

    • understanding           (does he know about and care about my concerns?)

    • responsiveness         (is he willing to respond to my needs?)

 

B.  Contemporary Issues   (McCroskey, 87-107)

 

1. Other important dimensions of the speaker's character that can help to persuade:

 

a)  Composure

  • does the speaker possess a high degree of emotional control?

  • or does he ramble, stammer, talk too quickly?

b)  Sociability

  • does the speaker seem friendly and have a pleasant quality about him?

c)  Extroversion

  • is the speaker outgoing, active and talkative?

 

2.  Types of Ethos:

 

a) initial ethos:  the source of ethos prior to the beginning of the communicative act.

  • a speaker can have either a high initial ethos if he is (1) authoritative (i.e., and expert on his subject) or (2) physically attractive

b)  derived ethos:  source of ethos produced during the act of communicating

  • a speaker will develop high derived ethos if he (1) starts with views that his audience will readily accept, (2) backs up his speech with hard data, (3) has a good style of delivery (increases his appearance of authority), (4) gives the appearance of sincerity, (5) avoids using fear appeals or militant language.

c) terminal ethos:  ethos of a source at the completion of the communicative act

  • effect of initial ethos + derived ethos

  • the only question that we need to ask here is whether the effect of the speaker's character has successfully persuaded the audience?

 

III.  The Ethos of the Audience

 

 

Exercise 2.3:  For each character type described below assess the following (1) How accurate is Aristotle's portrayal of the group that he is describing?  (2) How can we use the descriptions of these different character  types to help persuade an audience?

 

 

A.  Age  (2.12-14)

 

1.  the character of the young  (2.12)

 

a)  Aristotle's description of the young emphasizes the strength of their bodily drives.

 

b) the young, he claims....

  • have stronger passions than those who are older

  • are most swayed by sexual desire, and in this they often show a lack of self-control

  • have intense desires that tend to be short-lived

  • love honor, but love victory more, since young people love to win

  • tend to act out of anger more than those who are older

  • are more easily deceived and cheated than those who are older

  • tend to be optimistic, because they haven't been knocked down much by life and hopeful because they still have a long life ahead of them  

 

2.  the character of the elderly  (2.13) 

 

a) Aristotle's description of the elderly begins by showing that their character is contrary to that of the young.  The emphasis in this section is primarily upon the idea that the experience of the eldery in life makes them somewhat cynical.

 

b) the elderly, he maintains...

  • having lived a long time, having make mistakes, and having been taken in by others, view life with less confidence than the young.

  • tend to be overly cautious in their actions and in expressing opinions (e.g., they "think but never know")

  • tend to be more suspicious and distrustful than the young

  • live more in the past than the future, since their life is drawing to a close.

  • tend to be a bit stingy, because they know how hard money is to come by

  • feel pity for others, but more out of weakness than kindness

 

3.  the character of those in the prime of life  (2.14)

 

a) As opposed to the elderly who are often difficult to persuade and the young who are governed by their passions, Aristotle's description of those in their prime makes it clear that he believes that they are far more easily persuaded by reason.  Aristotle describes the prime of life as physically between 30 and 35 and intellectually between 30 and 49.

 

b) those in the prime of life, he says...

  • have characters free from the extremes of youth and old age (i.e., they are neither too rash nor too timid; neither too skeptical nor overtrusting; neither too generous nor too stingy)

  • combine the best traits of youth and old age, while avoiding many of the excesses.

  • tend to make decisions on a rational basis

 

B.  Circumstance (2.15-17)

  • "Tykhe can mean 'chance,' 'accident,' 'fortune,' or 'luck.'  To Aristotle it represents unmotivated contingency, not Fate or the predetermined will of some divinity; but he realizes that some people seem consistently luckier than others.  Some of the advantages Aristotle describes, for example, good birth, can be said to be a matter of chance; but power combines luck with ability and effort on the part of the person who has it."  (Kennedy 169)

 

1.  wealth  (2.16)

 

Those who possess great wealth, according to Aristotle...

  • tend to be insolent, overbearing and pretentious

  • value everything by money

  • tend towards ostentation (showiness) 

  • consider themselves entitled to everything (especially political power)

  • tend to do wrong more form 

  • all these vices are compounded in the nouveau riche

 

2. power  (2.17)

 

Those who possess great power...

  • are generally a better sort than the rich

  • tend to be even more ambitious and heroic

  • are more energetic and serious than other people because they want to stay in power

  • can be a bit overbearing, but also possess a dignified reserve

  • usually commit great rather than petty crimes.

 

 

 


 

Suggestions for Further Reading 

  • Cooper, Lane, trans. and intro.  The Rhetoric of Aristotle.  Englewood Cliffs, NJ;  Prentice Hall, 1962.

  • Garver, Eugene.  Aristotle's Rhetoric Chicago:  University of Chicago Press, 1994.

  • Grimaldi, William.  Aristotle's Rhetoric: A Commentary.  2 vols.  New York: Fordham University Press, 1980-1988.

  • Gill, Christopher.  "The Ethos/Pathos Distinction in Rhetorical and Literary Criticism."  Classical Quarterly 34 (1984): 149-166.

  • Kennedy, George A.  Aristotle:  On Rhetoric.  New York:  Oxford University Press, 1991.

  • McCroskey, James C.  Introduction to Rhetorical Communication.  Boston:  Allyn and Bacon, 1997.


 

Department of Philosophy Home Page   |   Sophia Project Home Page   |   Aristotle Page

© 2000, M. Russo         For more information contact:  mrusso@molloy.edu