Flawed Approaches to the Problem of Happiness

As I mentioned to you already, there were numerous attempts in the ancient world to come up with solutions for the problem of happiness.  Some of these solutions, naturally, were better than others.  

Before we examine some of the more profound attempts to address this question, I thought that it might be interesting first to look at some flawed approaches that have been attempted in the ancient world.  Among the less than satisfactory approaches that I would like to briefly examine are fatalism, hedonism, and immoralism.  

There are two main reason for proceeding in this way:   First, almost all of the great thinkers of the ancient world---Socrates, Plato, Aristotle and Augustine, among others---developed their own ethical systems as a reaction to the problems that they perceived in these flawed approaches.    

Second, many of these flawed approaches to happiness are still influential in our own times and often exert what I believe to be a harmful influence on our society.  It behooves us, therefore, to try to understand where thinkers in the past have gone astray in their attempt to understand the nature of human happiness, so that we might avoid falling into the same kind of errors.

Let's begin our study by examining the Fatalist approach to happiness: 

 


Table of Contents  |  Sophia Project  |  Department of Philosophy

© 2002, M. Russo         For more information contact:  mrusso@molloy.ed